https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index en-au 5 https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:52422 Wed 11 Oct 2023 12:05:53 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:54139 Tue 06 Feb 2024 11:49:40 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:54971 Mon 25 Mar 2024 15:20:41 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:46400 Journal of Interprofessional Care. The Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of included papers. Study findings were extracted, critically examined and grouped into themes. Twelve studies conducted in six different countries met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis revealed five themes: (1) shared philosophy; (2) communication and clinical interaction; (3) physical environment; (4) power and hierarchy; and (5) financial considerations. This review has identified diverse key elements related to interprofessional collaboration in primary health care, as perceived by allied health professionals. Opportunity for frequent, informal communication appeared essential for interprofessional collaboration to occur. Allied health professionals working in close proximity to health practitioners from other professions had more regular interprofessional interactions than those who were geographically separated. Co-location of multiple primary health care services within the same physical space may offer increased opportunities for interprofessional collaboration. Future research should avoid reporting on allied health professionals in primary health care collectively, and isolate data to the individual professions. Direct observational methods are warranted to investigate whether allied health professionals’ perceptions of interprofessional collaboration align with their actual clinical interactions in primary health care settings.]]> Fri 18 Nov 2022 14:48:51 AEDT ]]>